See our newest studies at

Read more »

Most mental health funding is not targeted to those who need help the most and we must overhaul our system of care, Doris A. Fuller tells Washington Journal host Steven Scully on C-SPAN.

Watch Here>>

To find out about HR 3717

Read more »

SAMSHA Ignores Severe Mental Illnesses in Proposed "Principles of Recovery"

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has now closed the public comment period on its 10 proposed “guiding principles of recovery” from mental illness and substance abuse, and they are worthy of comment.

Consistent with the agency's entire drift toward characterizing mental health as “behavioral” in nature rather than neurological or medical, SAMHSA has proposed a “working definition of recovery” that only incorporates behaviors. Factors like … accurate diagnosis, timely intervention, appropriate treatment, patient education, safe housing are nowhere to be found. In their place are “essential experiences” such as the “many pathways” to recovery and recognition that recovery is “culturally based.” The role of “treatment” is given the same weight as “dental care.” 

Thanks to all of you who participated in the SAMHSA forums by commenting and voing. You did make a difference. Comments supporting the view that mental illness is a brain disease that needs and deserves treatment were among the most strongly supported.

For SAMSHA's list and explanation of its proposed guiding principles, visit “Recovery Defined – Give Us Your Feedback.” (Comments in the blog following the explanations are not eligible for direct comment or voting.)

To learn more about SAMSHA's discriminatory approach to severe mental illness, read "Bureaucratic Insanity" by Dr. E. Fuller Torrey

Page 16 of 23

Visit Your State

News and Commentary